Home

Advertisement

Customize
 
 
18 August 2008 @ 02:24 pm
This disclaimer thing  
Lately I've gotten a few e-mails or other inquiries from people who finished reading  Too Cool to be Forgotten and have asked what was up with the disclaimer in the back. I offer a brief explanation for the curious below the cut but consider this a big spoiler warning for those who haven't read it...

One reason I enjoy working with Top Shelf is that they generally give me a very long leash: I give them a basic idea of what the story is about and they either say yes, that's something they'd like to see me do or not. More or less the only time they see the "finished" product is when it's done. I say "finished" in quotes because that's when the arduous process of proofreading, corrections and editorial suggestions start. The latter generally falls into the category of Chris Staros telling me scenes that are confusing or could be stronger if this character said this or whatever. What I like is that these are suggestions, and I'm free to ignore them if I disagree. Obviously, stuff like typos or other results of my oft sloppy lettering are things I want fixed. 
Which brings us to the dad/did section of our program. After Chris and Rob (who proofread it) marked it as a mistake, I explained to Chris what I was going for. He understood, but didn't think it really worked. I understood, but figured it was my book so I was willing to take a chance. He understood, but given the number of typos which managed to slip through the cracks with my other books he might've been worried people would just see it as Another Top Shelf Typo, or maybe he just thought it was clumsy and heavyhanded. Basically, we went back and forward over the space of a phone call. 
It was me, actually, who came up with the idea of a diclaimer. I figured if it was in the fine print in the back or in the indicia, who would notice? And if they did, it might be kind of funny, in a Dave Eggers kind of way. I would get what I wanted and Top Shelf gets to look like the good guy deferring to the judgement of their pretentious artist. I was a little surprised when they agreed and asked me to write the disclaimer, but what the heck. 
After the book came out I joked with Chris Staros that we would sort of survey the readership to see who they agreed with and if (knock wood) there was a second printing either the typo or disclaimer would go. While ideally I would've liked to have skipped the disclaimer altogether, and have the typo run without comment, I'm surprised at the negative reaction it's gotten. Not thousands of angry telegrams or anything but enough e-mails where people have said (especially since it's the last bit in the book) that it left a mild bad taste in their mouth. As much as I like the heavy handed foreshadowing, I regret if the whole business interfered wth anyone's enjoyment of the book. 

Hmmm, that wasn't as spoiler filled as I thought. I guess I don't need to cut. Never mind!


YoungAndyCover.jpg picture by bopalex
Above: the cover to 2 Cool 2 B 4gotten was originally going to feature a yearbook theme. I did this picture in black and white, and later Matt Kindt did watercolors over it, but ultimately we switched to the cigarette theme.
 
 
Current Mood: geeky
Current Music: "Bee Charmer" by Nellie McKay
 
 
( 5 comments — Post a new comment )
Scott McD.[info]sequentialscott on August 18th, 2008 08:26 pm (UTC)
I noticed it when reading and figured it was a typo. At the end, I read the disclaimer and understood. Had the disclaimer not been there I would never have guessed it was intentional. I might have gotten it on a re-read. Did it interfere with my enjoyment? No, not at all. People who get upset at typos, I've always felt, could perhaps stand a perspective re-adjustment.

I read it at Comic-Con and haven't yet done a re-read, though I'm sure I will. My take is that the emotional issues with his dad being the core of the story came out of left field but worked anyway. Was that at the root of his smoking problem? Maybe, but who could say really? That idea of getting to go back and say goodbye to someone you love is a rich one - but in retrospect the smoking issue is a convenient way to get him into a situation where he could. For a while it's the A plot, but then it turns out to be a B plot. Is that how you view it, or do you see his relationship with his dad to be part and parcel of the smoking addiction?
Alex Robinson[info]alexbot3000 on August 18th, 2008 09:27 pm (UTC)
Someone once told me they watched THE SIXTH SENSE and really loved it. Then they watched the DVD extras and M. Knight explained everything behind the movie. My friend said that it totally ruined the movie for him. Part of me feels like it can be a mistake for an author to explain too much, but, oh, just this once.

I guess I saw the smoking as rooted in unresolved issues with his father. I always like Kurt Vonnegut's idea that smoking was sort of a slow form of suicide, and you could see Andy's smoking as a way of punishing himself about his guilt.
(Anonymous) on August 25th, 2008 02:16 am (UTC)
"typo"
i loved the freudian slip idea. i loved the disclaimer at the end, which makes it obvious to everyone because, as clever as it is, i'd forgotten about it by the time i reached the end and was drying the tears off from my eyes.
I Dare You to Make Less Sense[info]goman1 on August 19th, 2008 01:03 am (UTC)
If I'm thinking of the right spot, I read it as a freudian slip kind of thing, not a typo. You'd already set up the off-panel dad enough that I figured he'd be important at some point. But then, I completly missed the disclaimer, so I could just be oblivious to everything.
Chris Radtke[info]radtke327 on August 19th, 2008 03:19 pm (UTC)
I got it when I read it and thought it was very clever. I read the disclaimer and got mad.
 
 

Advertisement

Customize